![]() ![]() ![]() In some cases, the data is based on web traffic which is also fraught with difficulty (as the same version of browser can be installed on multiple versions of macOS). Others even lump macOS and iOS together in the same bucket. Many sources just lump the different versions of macOS together in the one bucket. In my experience data for macOS adoption (as opposed to iOS) is fraught with inconsistencies. Does anyone have any data? Including from his own site if nothing else just if it has at least 1k Mac users a month? I would assume that Big Sur has similar to what Catalina had in this period of year (41%) and that all other values should be corrected by multiplying with 59%.īut that is just a guess. csv you will see that all values add up to 100% and there is no 'Big Sur' or 'Other' category. However on that source there is no data for Big Sur - if you download. I can't find any data on Big Sur market share among Mac versions. As such there can't be any data originated from the web sites and as most currently published data originates from that source it is likely that there won't be any data on this. ![]() ![]() But I have found new info that Big Sur doesn't send to the web sites in UserArgent that it is the version 11.00 as Apple expected problems with web site compatibility. Update: I can't answer as the question is closed (interesting enough I have received a badge for the popular question for the question that was closed). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |